Post by perthling on Jul 1, 2012 8:50:56 GMT -6
My wife recently had an episode of what appeared to be a prolapsed intervertebral disc. Her symptoms were almost purely peripheral with casebook L5 distribution. Being a former physiotherapist, and recognising that after 2 weeks her condition had not improved as anticipated (if a PID), we proactively pursued this further.
A nerve root sheath injection under CT was recommended. However during the preliminary CT an abnormality was identified. This was confirmed two days later on MRI and suspected schwannoma on the L5 nerve (10mm diameter, along 17mm length; mostly extraforaminal, not impinging on the spinal cord). Not bad to pick this up in under 3 weeks (as reading the medical literature, it appears cases are generally diagnosed between 4 months and many years).
My wife is currently in constant pain (analgesics reduce but do not alleviate the pain), allodynia / abnormal heightened and altered sensations, no more than 60-90 minutes sleep per night for the last 3 weeks, ambulates with crutches, has significant atrophy of her affected lower limb, unable to work (is being replaced now, hopefully can return as casual when able), unable to care for our darling 3yo daughter, and I'm also losing out on heaps of sleep and falling behind at work.
What surprises me (and I would love to know your thoughts) is the neurosurgeon has recommended conservative management. Admitedly this was in an ED setting and not a normal consult in one's offices. He recommended a 3 month follow up MRI. I challenged him that my understanding was schwannomas are very slow growing, and that a MRI done in October (8 months before) showed no signs at all; as a baseline, this suggests atypical growth rates (not necessarily indicative of anything more sinister, but hard to justify the "wait and see" approach). He revised his recommendation to a 6-8 week follow up, however given her present symptoms and disruption to our lives it still doesn't make sense...
WILL A SYMPTOMATIC SCHWANNOMA SPONTEOUSLY RESOLVE?
That's the only conclusion I can come up with concerning his recommended mode of management and reading between the lines. Reading further in the literature, it seems that resection is the recommended course for symptomatic extramedullary schwannomas, avoiding further growth and potential involvement of the spinal cord. I have not read anything in support of conservative management (except in the case of asmptomatic lesions) nor spontaneous resolution. The only peculiarity I can see that might influence whether a surgical course is taken is a mild sacralisation of the L5 transverse process, but that wouldn't preclude a partial laminectomy(?). Are we right in pushing for a second opinion?
A nerve root sheath injection under CT was recommended. However during the preliminary CT an abnormality was identified. This was confirmed two days later on MRI and suspected schwannoma on the L5 nerve (10mm diameter, along 17mm length; mostly extraforaminal, not impinging on the spinal cord). Not bad to pick this up in under 3 weeks (as reading the medical literature, it appears cases are generally diagnosed between 4 months and many years).
My wife is currently in constant pain (analgesics reduce but do not alleviate the pain), allodynia / abnormal heightened and altered sensations, no more than 60-90 minutes sleep per night for the last 3 weeks, ambulates with crutches, has significant atrophy of her affected lower limb, unable to work (is being replaced now, hopefully can return as casual when able), unable to care for our darling 3yo daughter, and I'm also losing out on heaps of sleep and falling behind at work.
What surprises me (and I would love to know your thoughts) is the neurosurgeon has recommended conservative management. Admitedly this was in an ED setting and not a normal consult in one's offices. He recommended a 3 month follow up MRI. I challenged him that my understanding was schwannomas are very slow growing, and that a MRI done in October (8 months before) showed no signs at all; as a baseline, this suggests atypical growth rates (not necessarily indicative of anything more sinister, but hard to justify the "wait and see" approach). He revised his recommendation to a 6-8 week follow up, however given her present symptoms and disruption to our lives it still doesn't make sense...
WILL A SYMPTOMATIC SCHWANNOMA SPONTEOUSLY RESOLVE?
That's the only conclusion I can come up with concerning his recommended mode of management and reading between the lines. Reading further in the literature, it seems that resection is the recommended course for symptomatic extramedullary schwannomas, avoiding further growth and potential involvement of the spinal cord. I have not read anything in support of conservative management (except in the case of asmptomatic lesions) nor spontaneous resolution. The only peculiarity I can see that might influence whether a surgical course is taken is a mild sacralisation of the L5 transverse process, but that wouldn't preclude a partial laminectomy(?). Are we right in pushing for a second opinion?